This option will be discussed with St. David’s Hydroponics and investigated by the appointed drainage engineer.
4. DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS Proceeding with the drainage works will allow for the proposed major expansion of the greenhouses. There are still many steps to the process: appointing an engineer, a site meeting, determining the validity of the petition and more; but through the entire process, the landowners will have opportunities to voice concerns, make suggestions and provide input. 5. STRATEGIC PLAN N/A 6. OPTIONS Council has only two options when dealing with a petition for drainage works. One is to decide not to proceed with the drainage works, in which case the petitioner(s) can appeal the decision to the Drainage Tribunal; an appeal which the petitioner will very likely win in this situation. The other option is to decide to proceed with the drainage works, as is recommended in this report. 7. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Town will initially carry the costs during the process under the Drainage Act however the great majority of the costs will be borne by St. David’s Hydroponics and the remainder recovered through assessment to the lands within the watershed. 8. COMMUNICATIONS The petitioner, all affected landowners and road authorities, the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority and other relevant agencies will be notified of Council’s decision, as well as all future procedures in the process of establishing the drainage works. 9. CONCLUSION Proceeding with the drainage works will allow for a major development within the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake. Respectfully submitted, Rene Landry Brett Ruck Drainage Support Technician Environmental Services Supervisor Jeffrey Vyse, C.S.T. Sheldon Randall Manager of Public Works Chief Administrative Officer (I) ATTACHMENTS Petition Drain Letter_Aug.7.19.pdfPetition for Realignment.pdfCOTW map - Proposed Lavigne Drain Realignment.pdf2019 - June - Proposed Relocation Plan.pdf